Here’s how European companies actually got faster at solving customer issues last year

When a customer contacts a support team, two things are top of mind—how quickly they can solve their problem and how fast a company responds to them when they need help. In recent Zendesk research, 73 percent of customers worldwide say their number one priority is a fast resolution, while 59 percent say it’s a fast response that matters most.

Either way, it’s reason enough for companies to pay attention. No one wants to keep customers waiting, especially as good customer support experiences become increasingly important drivers of customer loyalty and spend.

In the last year, however, record high engagement from customers meant that for many companies it’s getting harder and harder to prioritise speed. In fact, tickets have settled at a 20 percent higher baseline globally compared to where they were just before the pandemic began. And for industries that saw the greatest impacts from the global shutdowns (think food and grocery delivery, e-commerce, and remote work and education platforms), these rates were even higher.

Grubhub, a US food delivery firm comparable to Deliveroo in Europe, reported a 100 percent growth in ticket volume since February 2020, largely due to new customers and increased concerns around safety. Similarly, teams at Siemens Financial Services had to adapt to a 30% spike in ticket volume due to COVID-19.

Globally, nearly a third of companies actually got faster at resolving customer issues, despite having more tickets coming in.

Despite the odds, globally nearly a third of companies using Zendesk actually got faster at resolving customer issues this past year. Though this group saw ticket volumes jump an average of 91 percent compared to 2019, resolution times fell by 53 percent.

That’s a cumulative 2.3 million minutes saved, on average, across the year, or 972 minutes per ticket. And what’s more, a similar number dropped their response times, as well.

 

How did they do it? To learn more, we looked deeper into the Zendesk Benchmark, which tracks key indicators from more than 90,000 companies that power their support operations using Zendesk. Here’s what we found:

Response and resolution times dropped across all channels

Companies that dropped their response and resolution times during the pandemic managed to do so across all channels, with improvements across phone, social messaging, and email and webform channels making some of the biggest differences.

While adoption rates were similar when compared to other companies, we did notice that those who improved their response and resolution times were less reliant overall on phone support—which makes sense.

When customers call in for support, the agent they speak with can only work on that one ticket at a time. There’s no moving back and forth between tickets or handling multiple chat windows simultaneously. Of course that’s not the only way to think of channel benefits or drawbacks—many customers actually prefer phone support because it’s direct and more personable. But it’s certainly not the most effective way to tackle huge ticket backlogs.

For more efficient companies, full resolution times dropped across all channels while tickets were rising across almost all channels.

 

Full resolution time

From among companies in Europe and the UK that had at least a 2% increase in ticket volume and a 2% decrease in full resolution time….

• They managed to reduce full resolution time by 62%, even while managing a 76% increase in ticket volume.

First response time

From among companies in Europe and the UK that had at least a 2% increase in ticket volume and a 2% decrease in first response time….

• They managed to reduce first response time by 45%, even while managing a 76% increase in ticket volume.

Small gains from workflow management tools add up

Sometimes it’s the little things that make all the difference. When it comes to getting faster answers for customers, nothing seems to matter more than the small efficiency gains from using tools like macros, triggers, and automations.

European companies that increased their efficiency (by dropping their response or resolution times by at least two percent, while also managing at least a two percent increase in tickets) were:

• 16% more likely to be adding automations;
• adding automations at a 36% faster rate, and;
• using 15% more automations, on average.

Companies in Europe that are resolving customer issues faster are:

• 22% more likely to be adding automations;
• adding automations at a 27% faster rate, and;
• using 10% more automations, on average.

Automating time-consuming parts of the agent workflow, including one feature that makes it possible for diners to make order changes and initiate refunds themselves, has helped Grubhub reduce their contacts per order by 37 percent. “We’re now at the lowest contacts-per-order rate that we’ve seen in years,” says Michael Wireko, Director of Care Support at Grubhub.

And it’s an easy process fix to implement. After the initial surge, Grubhub’s team got new workflow automations up within two weeks, making it possible to handle mass cancellations and refunds when restaurants weren’t able to fulfill orders, and proactively create tickets so that agents could intervene on a diner’s behalf.

Agents are quickly becoming more efficient

When agents don’t have to spend as much time working on simple, repeatable tasks like routing tickets to the right person or sending mass responses to customers with the same issue, they’re able to focus on solving more problems.

Unsurprisingly, this group has made some remarkable gains in agent efficiency. In fact, companies responding faster to customers over the past year saw globally a 72 percent jump in the average number of tickets processed per agent, a rate that increased nearly 50 percent faster than other companies.

Companies in Europe that are responding to customers faster are:

• 25% more likely to have an agent or agents working across channels in a given day;
• have 36% more agents working across multiple channels within a day.

Companies in Europe that are resolving customer issues faster are:

• 25% more likely to have an agent or agents working across channels in a given day;
• are increasing their use of blended agents (agents working across multiple channels within a day) 63% faster than other EMEA companies.

And these companies are now relying more on agents that can work across channels, so-called “blended agents.” Put simply, having agents that can staff multiple channels means that teams can scale support as needed to meet any changes in demand. The average daily number of agents working across multiple channels spiked 71 percent—22 percent faster than everyone else.

Self-service helps to solve problems before they become tickets

Self-service also has an important role to play. And why not? When customers can find the answers they need themselves, they don’t need to speak to a support agent. At scale, these ticket deflections mean fewer backlogs, reduced wait times for other customers, and more time for agents to spend on complex issues.

It makes sense then that companies responding faster to customers—even while managing higher ticket rates—are adding articles to their help centers 70 percent faster than those who have been unable to keep response rates low.

Discord, a communication platform typically used by gamers, saw its user base expand exponentially over the last year. Virtual classrooms, book clubs, study groups, restaurateurs, and digital conventions all began to use Discord to gather online.

To manage the influx in customer requests, the support team leaned on their help center. “We get about a million hits a month,” said Danny Duong, Director of Customer Experience at Discord. “If you equate that to ticket deflection, we’re eliminating tens of thousands of contacts.” With a 10 percent deflection rate, one out of every 10 Discord users that needs help never has to contact an agent to get it.

Help your support team work smarter

When it comes to getting faster answers for customers, the way you work might be the only thing standing in your way. Where should companies start if they’re looking to find and eliminate bottlenecks that are slowing down their support teams?

Dive deeper into your one-touch tickets

If your team solves a high percentage of tickets with just a single touch, you might be missing opportunities to take advantage of time-saving automations or help center content that can reduce the burden on your agents.

Start by taking stock of the kinds of questions or issues that only require a single agent response and whether these tickets can be addressed with a macro or trigger, or even additional help center content.

Audit existing macros and triggers

Check up on the macros and triggers that you already have in place. How often have they been used in the last 30 days? For highly used macros, consider making them a trigger instead.

Here’s a quick example: if an agent frequently uses a macro to respond to a refund request, they still have to manually close the ticket. A trigger could manage both—respond and mark the ticket as solved—saving valuable time.

Talk to agents

No one understands the ins and outs of your work streams better than your agents. Talk to those front line agents to get a better sense of what would make their lives easier. Where can the team be more efficient? How can they better deflect tickets with help center content?

Getting faster at responding to customers doesn’t have to mean a complete overhaul of how you work. In fact, the smallest changes to how you triage and process tickets may end up having the biggest impact.